InterPoker | Ladbrokes PokerLadbrokes Poker | Pacific Poker | Royal Vegas Poker | Crazy Vegas Poker | PKR
Free Texas Calculatem | Free Poker Office | Holdem Genius
Tuesday, July 10, 2007 

-EV


I think my magic is gone, and at the moment I'm definitely a -EV player. I got lucky and came third in an 18 player tourney with Juice, Rosie and Acorn the other day. The win involved rivering two superior (well, they were ahead when I pushed, but I actually think they were both idiots) players. In one hand my K9o all in defeated AA when I hit a runner runner straight. Good times. Since then, I've tried some limit Poker at Jokerstars. My problem, I believe, is that I'm suffering from a weak form of tricky player syndrome. I'm raising with nothing, with the aim of either gaining a free card on the turn, or seeing if the player will fold. However, when the player calls my raise, and then bets the turn, there isn't much I can do but fold. That has cost me a bit. And it's even more grating when I know my opponent probably doesn't have anything.

In order to improve my game, I believe that I need to reduce the aggression, and just try to play the odds. To reduce the boredom, I might need to multi-table, though that will make it harder to read the opposition. I should probably try to select better tables too. If a table only has one maniac who's raising everything, the pots will be small, and variance high as I'll need to call down his bets with marginal hands. Tables with many loose passive players should help me increase my bankroll in a steadier and less volatile manner.

Aside from Poker, I'm off work this week and just being a bum. I might go and play squash with my retired mate. Either that, or watch him attempt some lines from that pickupguide site. I'm tempted to bring him out of retirement and get him a trading job, but while he's keen, the timing isn't quite right yet.

I read my first newspaper of many months this morning. The front page article was something to do with educating children about finances. That's all well and good, but lots of financial incentives provide poor value for the average citizen. Take ISAs for example...

Stocks and shares ISAs are limited to £7k per year. The benefit of having shares inside an ISA is that the profits are tax free. However, capital gains taxes on shares are only applied to profits above £7k per annum. So unless an investor has a large portfolio, or gets lucky on a risky punt (not the sort of thing the government should be encouraging), there is little chance of them seeing any benefit from an ISA. In fact, they'll probably lose out, as ISA's have admin fees. I think I have to pay £25 per annum with Selftrade, even though I'm not making more than £7k per year.

Doing some geeky maths, assuming shares go up by an average of around 15% a year, an investor is going to need £47k in their ISA before they see the tax free benefits. Ignoring property, that's more than most people have.

Therefore, like my Poker game, ISAs are -EV. The main beneficiaries are the stock brokers who get to charge admin fees to the blind masses.


Comments:

 

# dD wrote at 12:51 PM :

another thing which is such a fucking con is the good old "savings account" ...

lets say you save a grand and you get 5% net ... thats a paltry £50 after a year ...

what the fuck, I mean seriously, what the fuck, are you gonna do with fifty quid ??

but the dumb sheep and I mean dumb (they are following the sheep in front soooo close their head is up the sheep in fronts arse) are too busy ogling their fifty quid to see ... baa baa baaa baaa

oops ... sorry edge, u touched a live one there :(

regards

dD
 

# dD wrote at 1:02 PM :

edge

re the poker tps or fps (fancy play syndrome) as i know it ...

cut it out !
stop doing it right now !
immediately !

ffs ! the levels we play at, the donkeys wouldn't recognize fps if you shoved it up their arse sideways ...

so pack it in and try something simpler ... fold. with. nothing.

especially when playing limit !!

it may be grating laying it down on the turn, but if his "nothing" is better than your "nothing" ...

regards

dD
 

# The Edge wrote at 10:43 PM :

Regarding savings accounts, what confuses me is the anger caused when banks fail to pass on increases in rates.

When ING failed to pass on a 0.25% rate rise infuriated people on the news were saying that they were leaving ING and would never bank with them again. That 0.25% represents £2.50 per year, for every grand that a saver has invested. There are much easier ways to make/save £2.50 than going through all the malarky of opening up a new bank account. Making a sandwich, instead of buying one, will save that amount in less than a week.

There's no point pretending that banks aren't there to screw people, but the time wasted on counting pennies is bewildering.
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?