
I believe that I may have finally reached the gates of Heaven -
Pacific Poker.
Ladbrokes has been quiet lately. With few players and tight tables that are hard to take money from. I therefore took a look at the fishfest that is Pacific Poker. Comparing the $0.50/$1.00 limit tables (see screenshot above) reveals some glaring differences.
- Pacific Poker has loads of full tables (those shown n the screenshot only represent about a quarter of those available)
- The Players per Flop percentages (at the full 10 player tables) at Pacific Poker are all higher than the comparative statistic at Ladbrokes' lone 10 player table.
- The average pot sizes at Pacific Poker are all higher than at Ladbrokes.
Conclusion: Pacific Poker has many more players than Ladbrokes Poker. Players at Pacific Poker also happen to be looser and willing to put more money into the pot.
I'm therefore keen to give Pacific Poker another try, despite my hatred of their poor software and lack of multi-table support. However, Juice appears to be hiding, and I'm too scared to venture into that unfamiliar environment on my own so I'll have to dip my toes in later. I've deposited $50 with Pacific Poker (via neteller) to finance this experiment and also collected a 25% first deposit bonus.
Please
click here if you'd like to join for some fishing at Pacific Poker.