Articles

Free Software

Other Poker Profit Pages

Poker Rooms

Recent Posts

Archives

Other Sites that I Run

InterPoker | Ladbrokes PokerLadbrokes Poker | Pacific Poker | Royal Vegas Poker | Crazy Vegas Poker | PKR
Free Texas Calculatem | Free Poker Office | Holdem Genius
Saturday, March 12, 2005 

The All In Strategy


Introduction


This post will provide a statistical analysis of the all in strategy that I have been experimenting with lately. In brief, the strategy involves waiting for a good premium hand and going all in. It sounds simple and it is!

Definitions


Excellent Premium Hand


I have defined an Excellent Premium Hand as a hand in the folling group:
AA-99, Aks-AQs, KQs-KJs, QJs
These are the sorts of hands that I believe other players will call my all ins with.

All In Hand (AIH)


Using I calculated the equity values of a few top premium Poker hands when played against one or two Excellent Premium Hands. The equity values below and expected returns per $1.00 of All In bets:


(Useful probabilties can be found here, though the table above was all calculated manually in Excel)
The table shows that hands AA-QQ have a positive expectancy against one or two callers. AKs has a breakeven expectancy.
I shall therefore define my All In Hands as AA-QQ and AKs. The reason why I have included AKs is because I feel that hands won through stealing blinds could give it a slight edge.

The All In Strategy


The All In Strategy (AIS) will be executed as follows:
- Sit down at a No Limit Holdem table.
- Buy in with 50+ Big Blinds but less than the lowest pot on the table
- Post Blinds and check/fold
- If you're the on the big blind, check and are dealt the nuts on the flop then go all in.
- If you're dealt an AIH then go all in pre-flop.
- If you win a hand then leave the table and come back when you're able to buy in with your original amount again.

Estimated Expected Returns


At this point I am unable to estimate any probabilities for how many opponents will call, fold or leave dead money in the pot when I go all in. However, I will do my best to make some realistic estimates.

For my estimates I shall consider a $1/$2 full 10 player table where I buy in with $100 and refill up to $100 everytime I post a big blind. Every 100 hands will therefore cost $30 in blinds.

Summing the probabilities of being dealt an AIH gives the probability of being dealt an AIH. This is 1.67%. So I will be dealt 1.67 AIh's per 100 hands.
If my opponents all fold when I go All In then I'll get over
$3 * 0.0167 * 100 = $5.00
from the blinds (over, since there could be money from callers who fold). This will give me atleast $5.00 and is non-optimal considering I'll be paying $30 in blinds.

If 1 opponent calls, and assuming a 5% rake, then I'll win over
$100*($0.63+$0.42+$0.18)*0.95=$116.24.
[N.B. The above uses rounded figures that I ignored in Excel]
per 100 hands. This will give me an expected return of over $86.24 per 100 hands.

Similarly, if 2 opponents call then I'll win over
$200*($0.48+$0.25+$0.06)*100=$148.42
per 100 hands. This will give me an expected return of over $118.42 per 100 hands.

Possible Calculation Errors


- The All ins might not always be $100 as that would require a rebuy after every blind is posted (a lot of effort!).
- Loose players could call me with hands that aren't in the Excellent Premium Hand set. But this will work in my favour and therefore does not concern me.
- Players are always coming and going and seats could easily remain unfilled. The blinds will therefore cost a little more than I have estimated.

The Story So Far


This strategy sounds very far fetched due to its simplicity. I have therefore beeing trying it out on $0.01/$0.02 tables at Noble Poker with a $1.00 buy in.
results so far

Conclusion


It's currently too early to tell whether or not this is a viable Poker Strategy. The analysis is looks good but practical issues could easily see it fail. The only way forward is to run a practical experiment. I shall do this and results shall be posted on Poker Profits.


Comments:

 

# SirFWALGMan wrote at 9:53 PM :

Interesting post. It just over simplifies things alot though. In addition, I think .01/.02 players will tend to call your all in bets with 66-JJ more often than 100/NL players, thus your expected earn rate is highest at the lowest levels.
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?